A day after voicing dissent over his exclusion from the CPI(M) State committee, senior social gathering chief A. Padmakumar has softened his stance towards the social gathering management.

Talking to the media on Tuesday, Mr. Padmakumar acknowledged that airing his grievances publicly was a mistake and expressed his willingness to simply accept any disciplinary motion from the social gathering. He introduced his resolution to take part within the district committee assembly and clarified that his emotional response stemmed from his deep attachment to the social gathering and his unwavering dedication to its trigger.

“I realise now that voicing my criticism in public was a mistake. It ought to have been addressed throughout the social gathering. As soon as I understood this, I accepted duty for my actions and can abide by any resolution the social gathering takes on this regard. As human beings, all of us make errors, however the CPI(M) has the energy to right the errors dedicated by its cadre,” he mentioned.

Relating to his assembly with CPI(M) district secretary Raju Abraham, Mr. Padmakumar expressed satisfaction that the social gathering had reached out to him. He additionally revealed that a number of political leaders, together with P.V. Anwar, the State coordinator of the All India Trinamool Congress, had contacted him following the controversy.

Reaffirming his dedication to the social gathering, Mr. Padmakumar dismissed the BJP leaders who visited his dwelling as “political beggars”. He accused the BJP of making an attempt to achieve publicity by associating together with his identify, claiming that their go to and subsequent picture session at his home in his absence had been mere political stunts.

Mr. Padmakumar had left the CPI(M) State convention venue in Kollam on Sunday (March 9, 2025) with out attending the general public assembly. He later posted a cryptic message on Fb, which learn “dishonest, betrayal, and disrespect, what stays after 52 years”. The message, nevertheless, was deleted shortly after.

The subsequent day, nevertheless, he but once more come out within the open, voicing dissent over his non-inclusion within the State committee.