Whereas the required change was carried out on one engine inside the stipulated timeframe, the directive for the opposite was missed as a consequence of a report migration situation within the airline’s monitoring software program.
“Totally on account of the migration of data on the monitoring software program platform, the technical group missed the set off for one engine,” the airline stated.
It added that the mandatory adjustments had been made “as quickly as this was recognized” and that compliance for the second engine was additionally accomplished inside the deadline.
“We acknowledged the error to the DGCA and undertook remedial motion and preventive measures with quick impact. Crucial administrative actions had been additionally taken in opposition to the individuals held accountable,” the assertion stated.
This response comes in opposition to the backdrop of a confidential DGCA memo, which accused Air India Categorical of failing to interchange engine components inside the necessary timeframe and allegedly altering upkeep data to indicate false compliance.
The violations had been found throughout a routine DGCA audit in October 2024 and formally communicated to the airline in March this yr. The DGCA memo had flagged that the half modification “was not complied (with)” on one engine of an Airbus A320, inside the required limits.
It additionally raised issues over doable tampering of data within the airline’s Plane Upkeep and Engineering Working System (AMOS). The security lapse predates the tragic June crash of an Air India Dreamliner in Ahmedabad that killed 241 of the 242 folks on board, the deadliest aviation catastrophe in a decade.
Air India Categorical, which is presently present process fleet growth and integration with AIX Join (previously AirAsia India), has reiterated its dedication to “the very best requirements of security and regulatory compliance”.






