The AISEC method paper acknowledged that the Centre ignored the views of educationists, state governments and the broader public when finalising NEP 2020. “The central authorities has been forcibly imposing the coverage on the states,” the assertion learn, referring to the Supreme Court docket’s latest remark criticising the identical. The AISEC is now amassing public suggestions on the draft and plans to position the ultimate model earlier than a “Nationwide Individuals’s Parliament” in Bengaluru in January 2026.
The draft requires a secular, democratic and scientific schooling coverage in distinction to what AISEC describes because the “communal, undemocratic anti-science, privatised and commercialised” construction of NEP 2020. One of many central calls for is for schooling to be returned to the State Checklist and for the Structure to be amended accordingly. It additionally proposes that 10 per cent of the Central Price range and 20 to 25 p.c of State Budgets be allotted to schooling.
PEP additionally advocates reinstating the ten+2 system as a substitute of the 5+3+3+4 sample launched by NEP. It seeks to abolish the “no detention” coverage, reintroduce the pass-fail system with remedial assist and reverse the shift to a multidisciplinary method in undergraduate and postgraduate programmes. As an alternative, it requires discipline-specific curricula and a return to a two-year postgraduate mannequin, together with the restoration of the MPhil programme.
The draft coverage recommends annual examinations as a substitute of the semester system and expresses opposition to centralised admission exams like NEET and CUCET. It additionally requires everlasting appointments for lecturers fairly than rising reliance on visitor or contractual workers. “As soon as the ultimate draft of Various Individuals’s Schooling Coverage is prepared, AISEC proposes to submit it to the Central and state governments and demand its implementation inside a stipulated timeframe,” stated Prof P.L. Vishweshwar Rao, chairman of AISEC.
AISEC additionally raises objections to the perceived politicisation of curricula, distortion of historical past and science and compelled vocationalisation of schooling underneath the NEP banner. It insists on treating vocational schooling as a separate stream and calls for that analysis not be dictated by authorities or personal funding companies. AISEC additionally helps the autonomy of instructional establishments and opposes what it describes because the graded and pretend autonomy launched by the NEP.






